ABSTRACT
Background: The use of compounds against highly conserved cellular host factors required to complete the replication cycle of distinct viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 offers a common solution to diverse viral threats. This approach is especially relevant for pan-antiviral effects given that viruses converge at intracellular steps such as viral genome replication and protein production. Currently, there are only a limited number of approved drugs involved in targeting intracellular host factors. One of these compounds is plitidiepsin, which has shown a potent preclinical efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 by targeting the host protein eEF1A. Plitidepsin inhibits nucleocapsid viral protein expression and viral induced cytopathic effect in vitro. In addition, it also reduces genomic and subgenomic RNA expression. However, how plitidepsin exerts its antiviral activity remains unknown. Methods: Current models of SARS-CoV-2 replication propose that upon viral fusion, non-structural viral proteins form a replication-transcription complex that associates to compartments with a double membrane vesicle (DMV) morphology that shelters the viral genome replication. Here we have used an electron microcopy analysis to explore the antiviral effect of plitidepsin and its impact on SARS-CoV-2 replication and DMV formation on target Vero E6 cells. Results: This ultrastructural analysis allowed to recapitulate the SARS-CoV-2 infectious life cycle, where evident viral DMV formation was observed as well as viral budding events along with cell-associated viruses. However, in cells treated with plitidepsin at different non-toxic concentrations (0.2 and 0.05 μ M) there was a lack of viral DMV formation and a complete absence of viral particles. Complementary SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and dsRNA immunogold labelling unambiguously confirmed the lack of viral replication in plitidepsin-treated cells. Overall, these data indicate that plitidepsin treatment abrogated the formation of DMVs, and the detection of nucleocapsid or dsRNA viral products. Conclusion: Electron microscopy ultrastructural analysis coupled to immunogold labelling of SARS-CoV-2 products offer a unique approach to understand how antivirals work. This knowledge is key to identify the mechanism of action of promising compounds interfering with host factors whose implication in strategic biological processes can be applied as pan-antiviral strategies.
ABSTRACT
Containing the global severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has been an unprecedented challenge due to high horizontal transmissivity and asymptomatic carriage rates. Lateral flow device (LFD) immunoassays were introduced in late 2020 to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic or presymptomatic individuals rapidly. While LFD technologies have been used for over 60 years, their widespread use as a public health tool during a pandemic is unprecedented. By the end of 2020, data from studies into the efficacy of the LFDs emerged and showed these point-of-care devices to have very high specificity (ability to identify true negatives) but inadequate sensitivity with high false-negative rates. The low sensitivity (<50%) shown in several studies is a critical public health concern, as asymptomatic or presymptomatic carriers may wrongly be assumed to be noninfectious, posing a significant risk of further spread in the community. Here, we show that the direct visual readout of SARS-CoV-2 LFDs is an inadequate approach to discriminate a potentially infective viral concentration in a biosample. We quantified significant immobilized antigen-antibody-labeled conjugate complexes within the LFDs visually scored as negative using high-sensitivity synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging. Correlating quantitative X-ray fluorescence measurements and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) determined numbers of viral copies, we identified that negatively scored samples could contain up to 100 PFU (equivalent here to â¼10â¯000 RNA copies/test). The study demonstrates where the shortcomings arise in many of the current direct-readout SARS-CoV-2 LFDs, namely, being a deficiency in the readout as opposed to the potential level of detection of the test, which is orders of magnitude higher. The present findings are of importance both to public health monitoring during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to the rapid refinement of these tools for immediate and future applications.